William Joseph Mann appeals the summary denial of his motion seeking postcon-viction relief brought pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). For the reasons discussed below, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.

The appellant originally filed a postcon-viction motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.801 seeking additional jail credit, which was summarily denied on the merits. On appeal, this Court reversed and remanded with instructions for the trial court to either attach records refuting the appellant’s claim or enter an order providing the appellant with leave to amend his facially insufficient motion. See Mann v. State, 160 So.3d 554, 555 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015). On remand, the trial court provided the appellant with an opportunity to amend.

Instead of filing an amended motion seeking jail credit, the appellant filed the instant rule 3.800(a) motion, seeking credit for time previously spent in prison on the incareerative term of his original probationary split sentence pursuant to Dortly v. State, 107 So.3d 1229, 1230 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013). The lower court summarily denied the motion, indicating that the appellant was awarded one day of jail credit and failed to object to this credit at sentencing. In support of its order, the court attached the sentencing transcripts. However, in response to this Court’s Toler 1 order, the state properly concedes that these attachments do not refute the appellant’s claim.

Accordingly, we reverse the trial court’s order and remand for further proceedings. If the trial court again summarily denies the motion, the court shall attach record *703 excerpts which conclusively refute the appellant’s entitlement to'prison credit.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.