We review this matter pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Marcus K. Hood' challenges' the revocation of his probation and his resulting sentences for re-, sisting arrest without violence and driving with a suspended license. We affirm the revocation of probation and the sentences imposed without comment. We remand only for the correction of a scrivener’s *1172 error that appears on the face of the written order of revocation. See Margolis v. State, 148 So.3d 532, 532 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014). Although the order indicates that Hood admitted to violations of conditions two and three of his probation, the record reflects that he was found to have violated those conditions by the trial court following a hearing on the issue. On remand the trial court shall enter an order of revocation reflecting the correction of this error.

Affirmed; remanded with instructions.