Wims v. State
Wims v. State
159 So. 3d 1001; 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 4131; 2015 WL 1281649
(Southern Reporter, Third Series)
Wims v. State
Opinion of the Court
The petitioner alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is dismissed as successive. The petitioner is warned that any future filings deemed by this court to be successive, frivolous, abusive, or malicious may result in sanctions, including but not limited to a prohibition on any further pro se appearances before this court. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.410.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.