Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2015

Brown v. State

Brown v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided March 11, 2015 · Emas, Scales, Suarez
159 So. 3d 363; 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 3442; 2015 WL 1048380 (Southern Reporter, Third Series)

Brown v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See State v. Calloway, 658 So.2d 983 (Fla. 1995), receded from in part on other grounds in Dixon v. State, 730 So.2d 265 (Fla. 1999), (holding that a post-conviction motion, alleging trial court improperly imposed consecutive enhanced sentences for crimes arising from a single criminal episode, must be timely filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 (rather than rule 3.800), where the resolution of the motion requires factual determinations and cannot be determined upon the face of the record). See also Burgess v. State, 831 So.2d 137 (Fla. 2002); Flores v. State, 745 So.2d 977 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.