Hamblin v. State
Hamblin v. State
Opinion of the Court
Larry Hamblin appeals his judgment and sentence entered on his violation of probation (VOP) adjudication. He was adjudicated guilty of possessing a firearm as a convicted felon and sentenced to 10 years’ imprisonment. We find no reversible error. However, the sentencing document contains a scrivener’s error, rendering it inconsistent with the trial court’s oral pronouncement. During sentencing, the trial court imposed a $100.00 public defender fee, but the written “Order Revoking Probation” and the order on “Charges/Costs/Fees” both reflect a $200.00 public defender fee. Therefore, we affirm Hamblin’s judgment and sentence, but remand with instructions to correct the scrivener’s error. See Garcia v. State, 148 So.3d 848 (Fla. 5th DCA 2014); Croskey v. State, 71 So.3d 199 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011).
AFFIRMED; REMANDED with instructions.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.