Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2015

Norton v. State

Norton v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided March 31, 2015 · Marstiller, Osterhaus, Swanson
160 So. 3d 528; 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 4723; 2015 WL 1442531 (Southern Reporter, Third Series)

Norton v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is brought pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Having reviewed the entire record on appeal, we affirm Appellant’s conviction and sentence. However, we do so without prejudice to Appellant’s filing a post-conviction motion to correct unpreserved sentencing errors related to costs and fines imposed. See A.L.B. v. State, 23 So.3d 190, 192 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009) (“Today’s affirmance is without prejudice to appellant’s right to seek relief collaterally[.]”); Colon v. State, 869 So.2d 1290, 1290 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004) (“[O]ur affirmance is without prejudice to appellant’s filing an appropriate post-conviction motion raising any such unpreserved sentencing issues.”).

AFFIRMED.

MARSTILLER, SWANSON and OSTERHAUS, JJ„ concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.