Based on Westphal v. City of St. Petersburg, 122 So.3d 440 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013), we AFFIRM. In so doing, we certify that our disposition of the instant case passes upon the same question we certified in Westphal. Id. at 448. See Jollie v. State, 405 So.2d 418, 421 n. * (Fla. 1981). We do not reach the issue of reclassification of benefits, because such is premature in this case. See Quail Ridge v. Johnson, 584 So.2d 199 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991).