The state properly concedes that appellant could not be sentenced to ten years of drug offender probation because he was not eligible to receive drug offender probation in this case. See § 948.20(1), Fla. Stat. (2014). Accordingly, we reverse the imposition of drug offender probation and remand with directions that the trial court resentence ■ appellant without imposing *468drug offender probation. We otherwise affirm appellant’s judgment and sentence without comment.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded with directions.

dissenting.

I respectfully dissent. I would reverse appellant’s convictions on grounds the objection to Detective Lormil’s testimony as to what the victim’s body language communicated should have been sustained. Although I would not, therefore, reach the sentencing issue decided by the majority, I have no quarrel with the panel’s disposition of that issue.