Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal
Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. v. State, 190 So. 3d 120 (2015)
2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 13808; 40 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2148
Ciklin, Conner, Forst

Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. v. State

Opinion of the Court

ON MÓTIÓÑ FOR CERTIFICATION OF QUESTIONS OF GREAT PUBLIC IMPORTANCE

PER CURIAM.

We grant Appellants’ July 27, 2015 Motion for Certification of Questions of Great Public Importance and certify the following question to the Florida Supreme Court:

AFTER THE ENACTMENT OF SECTION 768.28, FLORIDA STATUTES, AND THE ADOPTION OF FLORIDA SENATE RULE 4.81(6), IS IT CONSTITUTIONALLY PERMISSIBLE FOR THE FLORIDA LEGISLATURE TO LIMIT THÉ AMOUNT OF ATTORNEYS’ FEES PAID FROM A GUARDIANSHIP TRUST ESTABLISHED ■ BY A LEGISLATIVE CLAIMS BILL?
CIKLIN, C.J., CONNER and FORST, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
SEARCY DENNEY SCAROLA BARNHART & SHIPLEY, P.A. Mark Edwards and Mitzi Dee Roden, as parents and natural guardians of Aaron Edwards, a minor William S. Frates, II, P.A. Edna L. Caruso, P.A. Vaka Law Group, P.L. and Grossman & Roth, P.A. v. STATE of Florida
Cited By
3 cases
Status
Published