Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. v. State
Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. v. State
190 So. 3d 120; 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 13808; 40 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2148
(Southern Reporter, Third Series)
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision.
- Searcy, Denney, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, etc. v. State of Florida (Fla. 2017)
- Grossman Roth, P.A. v. Mellen (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
ON MÓTIÓÑ FOR CERTIFICATION OF QUESTIONS OF GREAT PUBLIC IMPORTANCE
We grant Appellants’ July 27, 2015 Motion for Certification of Questions of Great Public Importance and certify the following question to the Florida Supreme Court:
AFTER THE ENACTMENT OF SECTION 768.28, FLORIDA STATUTES, AND THE ADOPTION OF FLORIDA SENATE RULE 4.81(6), IS IT CONSTITUTIONALLY PERMISSIBLE FOR THE FLORIDA LEGISLATURE TO LIMIT THÉ AMOUNT OF ATTORNEYS’ FEES PAID FROM A GUARDIANSHIP TRUST ESTABLISHED ■ BY A LEGISLATIVE CLAIMS BILL?
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.