Frederick v. State
Frederick v. State
155 So. 3d 1253; 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 1048; 2015 WL 341716
(Southern Reporter, Third Series)
Frederick v. State
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed. Defendant’s claim that his consecutive minimum mandatory sentences are illegal because they arose from the same criminal episode is rejected for the reasons stated in Williams v. State, 125 So.3d 879 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) (en banc).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.