Graham v. State
Graham v. State
181 So. 3d 582; 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 184; 2016 WL 67298
(Southern Reporter, Third Series)
Graham v. State
Opinion
Demhar Graham appeals his convictions for second-degree murder and tampering with physical evidence. We affirm his convictions without comment but remand for the trial court to enter a written order, nunc pro tunc, reflecting its oral finding that Graham was competent to proceed. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.212(c)(7) (“If, at any time after such commitment, the court decides, after hearing, that the defendant is competent to proceed, it shall enter its order so finding and shall proceed.”); see, e.g., Carroll v. State, 157 So.3d 385, 386 *583 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015); Williams v. State, 130 So.3d 763, 764 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014).
Affirmed; remanded with directions.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.