Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2016

Matthew J. Clark v. State of Florida

Matthew J. Clark v. State of Florida
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided January 20, 2016 · Stevenson, Gross
183 So. 3d 467; 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 726; 2016 WL 231498 (Southern Reporter, Third Series)

Matthew J. Clark v. State of Florida

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendant appeals an order denying a rule 3.801 motion to correct jail credit and seeks review of an order denying his motion for extension of time to move for rehearing. Although the defendant stated good cause for an extension of time, we affirm because he was not entitled to relief under rule 3.801 as.a matter of law. Our affirmance is without prejudice for him to file a timely rule 3.850 motion'if he can state a sufficient claim of ineffective assistance of counsel.

Affirmed.

STEVENSON, GROSS and MAY, JJ., • concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.