Matthew Morton challenges his sentences for armed burglary, two counts of burglary of an occupied dwelling, burglary of an unoccupied dwelling, and two counts of burglary of an unoccupied conveyance. He claims that in sentencing him the court improperly considered evidence of an uncharged homicide which occurred during one of the burglaries. Applying the rationale and analysis set forth in Imbert v. State, 154 So.3d 1174 (Fla. 4th. DCA 2015), we affirm the sentences.

Affirmed. '