We. affirm without discussion the circuit court’s orders: (1) granting the Department of Revenue’s motion for civil contempt against the father; and (2) denying the father’s motion to vacate the contempt order and motion for rehearing. The father’s argument that the circuit court erred in entering an order barring him from further pro se filing already was addressed in our case no. . 4D15-1914, in which the father petitioned, for a writ of certiorari. We granted the father’s petition and quashed the order, with directions to issue an order to show cause and afford the father a réasonable time to' respond before determining whether the sanction is *615 appropriate. Testa v. Testa, 171 So.3d 244, 244-45 (Fla. 4th -DCA 2015).

Affirmed.