Angel E. Cuesta v. Carolyn A. Cuesta
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- Voorhees v. Voorhees (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
We affirm without discussion: (1) that portion of the circuit court’s final order denying the former husband’s supplemental petition for termination or, in the alternative,, reduction in spousal support; and (2) the. circuit court’s order denying the former , husband’s motion for rehearing. We dismiss without prejudice the former husband’s appeal of that portion of the final order granting the former wife’s motion for attorney’s fees and costs, but reserving jurisdiction to determine those amounts. See Revier v. Revier, 45 So.3d 570, 571 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) (“We dismiss [the] aspect of the final judgment as it relates to the award of attorney’s fees since the trial court determined only entitlement and reserved the determination of amount for a future day.”).
*616 Affirmed in part, dismissed without prejudice in part.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.