Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2016

Andre Santonio Hill v. State of Florida

Andre Santonio Hill v. State of Florida
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided March 9, 2016 · Ciklin, Damoorgian, Levine, Per Curiam
186 So. 3d 1119; 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 3636; 2016 WL 903660 (Southern Reporter, Third Series)

Andre Santonio Hill v. State of Florida

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Andre Hill appeals the 'trial court’s order striking his rule 3.800(a) motion to correct illegal sentence. The court found that it lacked jurisdiction to consider the motion due to appellant’s pending appeal from the denial'of a related claim in a rule 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm.

We also find that appellant’s claim is meritless. Robbery with a deadly weapon is a first degree felony punishable by life imprisonment, § 812.13(2)(a), Fla. Stat. (2003). The trial court was required to impose a life sentence under the prison releasee reoffender : statute. See § 775.082(9)(a)3.a., Fla. Stat. (2003); McDonald v. State, 957 So.2d 605, 612-13 (Fla. 2007).

Affirmed.'

CIKLIN, C.J., DAMOORGIAN and LEVINE, JJ,, concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.