AFFIRMED. See Young v. State, 141 So.3d 161, 165 (Fla. 2013) (holding sufficiency of the evidence claim was not reviewable for fundamental error on appeal where defendant waived appellate review on- the specific issue of whether an uninhabitable building that had been undergoing renovation at the time of the break-in constituted a “dwelling” under the burglary statute, because defendant did not specifically argue at trial that the building was not a “dwelling” and the evidence established that, at the very least, defendant committed a burglary of a structure).