Arminan v. State
Arminan v. State
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed April 13, 2016.
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________ No. 3D16-381 Lower Tribunal No. 03-9926C ________________
Jiskly Arminan, Appellant, vs. The State of Florida, Appellee.
An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Daryl E. Trawick and Marisa Tinkler Mendez, Judges.
Jiskly Arminan, in proper person.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, for appellee.
Before ROTHENBERG, LAGOA and SALTER, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed, with the clarification that the prohibition in the decretal part of the trial court’s denial order, “Defendant is hereby PROHIBITED from filing any further motions without representation by a licensed member of the Florida Bar,” is limited to the case in which that Order was entered, namely State v. Arminan, Case No. F03-9926C, Circuit Court of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit for Miami- Dade County, Florida.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.