Hanna v. State
Hanna v. State
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed April 27, 2016.
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________ No. 3D15-5 Lower Tribunal No. 12-31570 ________________ Robert Hanna, Appellant, vs. The State of Florida, Appellee.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Stacy D. Glick, Judge.
Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Susan S. Lerner, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Jeffrey R. Geldens, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before WELLS, EMAS and LOGUE, JJ.
WELLS, Judge.
Robert Hanna appeals from his conviction and sentence for manslaughter, claiming the trial court erred in denying his motion for judgment of acquittal.
Alternatively, Hanna claims that he is entitled to a new trial because the standard jury instruction for self-defense was internally inconsistent and therefore fundamentally flawed; an investigating officer was improperly permitted to comment on Hanna’s guilt; and the lower court failed to conduct a complete Melbourne v. State, 679 So. 2d 759 (Fla. 1996), inquiry before excluding an African-American juror.
We find no merit in any of these claims but note that in rejecting Hanna’s claim as to the Melbourne issue, we join in the decisions in Spencer v. State, 41 Fla. L. Weekly D700 (Fla. 2d DCA Mar. 18, 2016), and Ivy v. State, 41 Fla. L. Weekly D704
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.