Darryl Lewis Davis petitions this court for writ of habeas corpus regarding his convictions and life sentences in two cases. Davis was charged in both cases with robbery with a firearm. Neither the' informa-tions nor the evidence presented in Davis’s trials alleged that he used any'weapon other than a firearm. Sepárate juries found Davis guilty of robbery with a deadly weapon but made special findings that he did not possess a firearm during the commission of the crimes.

We hold that it was error to list robbery with a deadly weapon as a lesser-included offense on the verdict forms in these cases. See Growden v. State, 372 So.2d 930, 931 (Fla. 1979); Stephens v. State, 396 So.2d 741, 742 (Fla. 5th DOA 1981); Deleon v. State, 66 So.3d 391, 394-95 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011). Furthermore, the verdicts and special findings were inconsistent. See Starling v. State, 152 So.3d 868, 868 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014); Nettles v. State, 112 So.3d 782, 783 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013). Failure to correct Davis’s convictions, which resulted in consecutive life sentences, would constitute a manifest injustice.

Accordingly, we grant Davis’s petitions for writ of habeas corpus and remand for entry of corrected judgments that adjudicate him guilty of robbery with a weapon and resentencing according to a revised Criminal Punishment Code scoresheet.

PETITIONS GRANTED.