Mister D. Paige v. State
Mister D. Paige v. State
196 So. 3d 574; 2016 WL 4069645
(Southern Reporter, Third Series)
Mister D. Paige v. State
Opinion
Mister Paige appeals his sentence arguing that, since he was not charged with a drug offense and no evidence was presented that he was a chronic substance abuser, he did not qualify to receive drug offender probation. See § 948.20 Fla. Stat. (2014); Green v. State, 178 So.3d 467 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015). The State properly concedes error. Accordingly, we remand this matter to the trial court to strike the drug offender probation order and enter a standard probation order.
AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; REMANDED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.