Aybar v. State
Aybar v. State
Opinion
The defendant, Ricardo Aybar, appeals the trial court’s order denying the defendant’s motion to suppress his blood alcohol test results. The record does not reflect a written order by the trial court finding that the suppression ruling would be dis-positive, nor is there a stipulation in the record that the ruling would be dispositive. Consequently, this Court has no jurisdiction to review the matter, and the appeal is dismissed. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i) 1 ; Williams v. State, 194 So.3d 511 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016); Pena v. State, 913 So.2d 1203, 1205 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005) (stating “[b]ecause we have concluded that the order on appeal was not dis-positive and the exception to the rule does not apply, we have no jurisdiction to reach the merits of this case.”).
Dismissed.
. Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i) states:
(A) Pleas. A defendant may not appeal from a guilty or nolo contendere plea except as follows:
(i) Reservation of Right to Appeal. A defendant who pleads guilty or nolo contendere may expressly reserve the right to appeal a prior dispositive order of the lower tribunal, identifying with particularity the point of law being reserved.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.