Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2016

Tzynder v. Edelsburg

Tzynder v. Edelsburg
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided January 27, 2016 · Emas, Rothenberg, Wells
184 So. 3d 583; 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 1004; 2016 WL 313863 (Southern Reporter, Third Series)
Tzynder v. Edelsburg

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Iehuda Tzynder áppeals from a final judgment modifying parental responsibility and timesharing. We affirm the final judgment in all' respects,, save one: the final judgment modifies Tzyn-der’s timesharing with the' minor child by restricting contact to one time per week, and requires that all contact with and access to the minor child be in a supervised setting. However, the final judgment fails to identify what steps Tzynder must take in order to reestablish unsupervised time-sharing. On remand, the trial court shall amend the final judgment to identify the necessary steps which Tzynder must take in order to reestablish unsupervised time-sharing with the parties’ minor child. See Hunter v. Hunter, 540 So.2d 235 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); Perez v. Fay, 160 So.3d 459 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015).

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.