Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2016

Woodman v. State

Woodman v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided March 18, 2016 · Berger, Edwards, Lambert
187 So. 3d 369; 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 4240; 2016 WL 1062771 (Southern Reporter, Third Series)

Woodman v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s order reinstating and modifying Appellant’s probation following an open plea. However, because the written order on appeal does not set forth the specific condition of probation that was violated, we remand for the entry of a proper order that specifies the condition of probation violated. See Perez v. State, 958 So.2d 1076, 1076 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007).

AFFIRMED; REMANDED for entry of proper order.

BERGER, LAMBERT, and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.