Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2016

Penn v. State

Penn v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided May 6, 2016 · Kelsey, Lewis, Osterhaus
190 So. 3d 258; 2016 WL 2610595; 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 7075 (Southern Reporter, Third Series)

Penn v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Upon review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), we find no error with Appellant’s judgment or sentence,, and affirm. We write only to correct a.scrivener’s error on Appellant’s scoresheet and order of community control. See Ashley v. State, 850 So.2d 1265, 1268 n. 3. (Fla. 2003) *259(defining a scrivener’s error as á written clerical • error that is not “the result of a judicial determination or-error”). Appellant was found guilty by jury verdict, but his scoresheet and order of community control incorrectly indicate that the charges were resolved by plea. On remand, the trial court shall correct this error. See Carter v. State, 173 So.3d 1048, 1051 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015) (affirming judgment but remanding for correction of scrivener’s error where scoresheet incorrectly indicated plea instead of trial); Drayton v. State, 89 So.3d 287, 287-88 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012) (mem.) (instructing lower court to correct documents indicating plea, where a jury found appellant guilty); Herrin v. State, 51 So.3d 1207, 1208 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011) (remanding .for correction of scrivener’s error in manner of disposition).

Judgment AFFIRMED and cause REMANDED for correction of scrivener’s error.

LEWIS, OSTERHAUS, and KELSEY, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.