Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2016

Arminan v. State

Arminan v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided April 13, 2016 · Lagoa, Rothenberg, Salter
190 So. 3d 662; 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 5594; 2016 WL 1449331 (Southern Reporter, Third Series)

Arminan v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed, with the clarification that the prohibition in the decretal part of the trial court’s denial order, “Defendant is hereby PROHIBITED from filing any further motions without representation by a licensed member of the Florida Bar,” is limited to the case in which that Order was entered, namely State v. Arminan, Case No. F03-9926C, Circuit Court of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit for Miami-Dade County, Florida.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.