Noell v. State
Noell v. State
193 So. 3d 1016; 2016 WL 3421475; 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 8854
(Southern Reporter, Third Series)
Noell v. State
Opinion of the Court
We affirm, in part, the denial of the appellant’s motion to correct illegal sentence. However, we remand for the trial court to strike the appellant’s designation as a sexual offender for count II (unlawful use of a two-way communications device) on the written judgment and sentence, as that offense does not qualify for sexual offender designation under section 943,0435(l)(a)l., Florida Statutes (2012). Because it is a ministerial act, the appellant need not be present. See Bauder v. State, 983 So.2d 1244 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008).
AFFIRMED in part; REMANDED in part with directions.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.