Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2016

Blundell v. Philip Morris USA Inc.

Blundell v. Philip Morris USA Inc.
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided September 6, 2016 · Makar, Winokur, Winsor
197 So. 3d 1289; 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 13349; 2016 WL 4607995 (Southern Reporter, Third Series)

Blundell v. Philip Morris USA Inc.

Opinion of the Court

ON REMAND FROM THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT

PER CURIAM.

On direct appeal, we affirmed the trial court’s conclusion that “Engle1 class members are prohibited from recovering punitive damages on negligence and strict liability claims” based on Soffer v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., 106 So.3d 456, 457 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012), which has since been quashed on that point of law. As such, we remand for reconsideration in light of Soffer v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco, Co., 187 So.3d 1219 (Fla. 2016). See R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Clayton, 193 So.3d 1088 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016).

REVERSED and REMANDED with instructions.

MAKAR, WINOKUR and WINSOR, JJ., concur.

. See Engle v. Liggett Group, Inc., 945 So.2d 1246 (Fla. 2006).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.