Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2016

Jackson v. State

Jackson v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided August 22, 2016 · Makar, Osterhaus, Ray
197 So. 3d 649; 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 12703; 2016 WL 4431586 (Southern Reporter, Third Series)
Jackson v. State

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Appellant raises a number of issues, all of which we affirm except as to the claim that his dual convictions for dealing in stolen property and grand theft (of $300 or more but less .than $5,000) violate principles of double jeopardy. See § 812.025, Fla. Stat. (2014); Blackmon v. State, 121 So.3d 535, 547-49 (Fla. 2013). We agree with Appellant, and remand with instructions to vacate the grand theft charge.

AFFIRMED in'part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED.

RAY, MAKAR, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.