Britt v. State
Britt v. State
200 So. 3d 801; 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 15054; 2016 WL 5874425
(Southern Reporter, Third Series)
Britt v. State
Opinion of the Court
Based on the State’s proper concession of error, we reverse and remand for resen-tencing on Counts I and II in accordance with Williams v. State, 186 So.3d 989 (Fla. 2016), which held that consecutive mandatory minimum terms under the 10-20-Life statute are permissible but not mandatory where, as here, the defendant shot at multiple victims. In all other respects, we affirm.
AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED and REMANDED in part.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.