Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2016

Lennon v. Hahne

Lennon v. Hahne
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided November 2, 2016 · Ciklin, Damoorgian, Klingensmith
202 So. 3d 956; 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 16223 (Southern Reporter, Third Series)

Lennon v. Hahne

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Appellant is not precluded from filing any future motions to modify or dissolve the injunction for consideration by the trial court. See Betterman v. Kukelhan, 977 So.2d 702, 703 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008).

Affirmed.

CIKLIN, C.J., DAMOORGIAN and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑