Capehart v. State
Capehart v. State
202 So. 3d 958; 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 16233
(Southern Reporter, Third Series)
Capehart v. State
Opinion of the Court
The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied except as it relates to the trial court’s oral pronouncement prohibiting early termination of probation, which is hereby stricken. See Arriaga v. State, 666 So.2d 949 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996). Since this pronouncement was not reduced to writing, there is no need to remand for correction of the judgment and sentence or the order of probation.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.