Pash v. Halko
Pash v. Halko
185 So. 3d 713; 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 2194
(Southern Reporter, Third Series)
Pash v. Halko
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed. However, the parties concede that paragraph 3 of the “ordered” section of the order on appeal contains a scrivener’s error. Accordingly, we remand so that the order- reflects counsels’ stated agreement that the child, A.S.H., would time share when he was willing to do so, but that' the child, A.C.H., would follow (one (1) day a week for four (4) hours).
Affirmed. Remanded to correct scrivener’s error.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.