Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2017

Kathleen Lynn Horn, Former Wife v. Mark Gordon Horn, Former Husband

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided January 17, 2017 · Bilbrey, Roberts, Winsor

225 So. 3d 292; 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 364; 2017 WL 163691 (Southern Reporter, Third Series)

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

Meggan Elizabeth Miller v. Matthew Lee Miller (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)
Elisia D. Preudhomme, Former Wife v. Kenneth Preudhomme, Former Husband (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018)
Darlene S. Horton, Former Wife v. John D. Horton, Former Husband (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

BILBREY, J.

The Appellant/former wife raises five points in this appeal. We find no reversible error with the final judgment other than paragraph N. That paragraph makes findings about the prospective benefit of relocation should the Appellee/former husband relocate with the child, A.H., from San Antonio, Texas, to any other location in the continental United States, including to the paternal grandmother’s residence in Virginia. It also permits relocation by the former husband without approval from the former wife or trial court.

As the Florida Supreme Court held in Arthur v. Arthur, 54 So.3d 454, 459 (Fla. 2010), “a best interests determination in petitions for relocation must be made at the time of the final hearing and must be supported by competent, substantial evidence.” See also Sylvester v. Sylvester, 992 So.2d 296 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008). Since paragraph N of the final judgment would allow the former husband to relocate without meeting the requirements of Section 61.13001, Florida Statutes, and since it finds that relocation is A.H.’s best interest without the need- for then-current, competent, substantial evidence to .support it, it is error.

Accordingly, we affirm all of the final judgment except paragraph N. We reverse with instructions that the trial court vacate paragraph N of the final judgment.

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part with instructions.

ROBERTS, C.J., and WINSOR, J., CONCUR.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.