Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2017

Advanced Eyecare v. Reemployment

Advanced Eyecare v. Reemployment
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided February 6, 2017

Advanced Eyecare v. Reemployment

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

ADVANCED EYECARE OF CENTRAL FLORIDA, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D16-2295 REEMPLOYMENT ASSISTANCE APPEALS COMMISSION, Appellee. ________________________________/ Opinion filed February 10, 2017 Administrative Appeal from the Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission.

Jason H. Clark, West Palm Beach, for Appellant.

Katie E. Sabo, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Advanced Eyecare of Central Florida (“Employer”) appeals from a final order of the Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission, which affirmed a referee’s decision allowing a terminated employee to receive unemployment benefits. Having carefully considered Employer’s arguments on appeal and the record before us, we affirm. See, e.g., Parker v. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 41 So. 3d 1090, 1090 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010) (“An appeal referee’s factual determinations are ordinarily presumed to be correct.

Thus, if there is substantial competent evidence in the record to support the appeal referee’s findings, . . . this court must affirm.” (citation omitted)).

AFFIRMED.

COHEN, C.J., SAWAYA and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.