Javier Madera v. State
Javier Madera v. State
Opinion
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
JAVIER MADERA, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D16-4352 STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. ________________________________/ Opinion filed September 22, 2017 Appeal from the Circuit Court for St. Johns County, J. Michael Traynor, Judge.
James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Allison A. Havens, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Robin A. Compton, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
We affirm Appellant’s convictions and sentences but do so without prejudice to Appellant filing a motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) or 3.850 on his claim that the imposition of drug offender probation in this case is illegal. Appellant failed to preserve this claim for review on direct appeal by either contemporaneously objecting to the alleged sentencing error or by filing a motion pursuant to rule 3.800(b)(2).
See Jackson v. State, 983 So. 2d 562, 569 (Fla. 2008).
AFFIRMED.
COHEN, C.J., LAMBERT and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.