Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2017

Leighdon Henry v. State

Leighdon Henry v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided October 30, 2017
Leighdon Henry v. State

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED LEIGHDON HENRY,

Appellant, v. Case No. 5D17-92 STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee. ________________________________/

Opinion filed November 3, 2017

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County,

Julie H. O'Kane, Judge.

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and

Nancy Ryan, Assistant Public Defender,

Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Leighdon Henry, Malone, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General,

Tallahassee, and Kellie A. Nielan,

Assistant Attorney General, Daytona

Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

We grant Leighdon Henry’s Motion for Rehearing, withdraw our earlier per curiam affirmance and substitute the following in its place.

As to Counts 1, 2, 3 and 5, the sentencing documents shall, on remand, be amended to reflect that Henry is entitled to a review of his sentence after serving twenty years, not twenty years after the date of his initial sentencing. See § 921.1402(2)(d), Fla. Stat. (2014); Tyson v. State, 199 So. 3d 1087, 1089 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016).

AFFIRMED and REMANDED.

PALMER, ORFINGER and TORPY, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.