Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2017

Lumpkin v. State

Lumpkin v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided February 7, 2017 · Kelsey, Ray, Winokur
210 So. 3d 722; 2017 WL 486992; 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 1441 (Southern Reporter, Third Series)

Lumpkin v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Based on the State’s proper concession of error, we reverse and remand for resen-tencing in accordance with Williams v. State, 186 So.3d 989 (Fla. 2016), which held that consecutive mandatory minimum terms under the 10-20-Life statute are permissible, but not mandatory, where, as here, the defendant shot at multiple victims. In all other respects, we affirm.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED and REMANDED in part.

RAY, KELSEY, and WINOKUR, JJ., CONCUR.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.