Lumpkin v. State
Lumpkin v. State
210 So. 3d 722; 2017 WL 486992; 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 1441
(Southern Reporter, Third Series)
Lumpkin v. State
Opinion of the Court
Based on the State’s proper concession of error, we reverse and remand for resen-tencing in accordance with Williams v. State, 186 So.3d 989 (Fla. 2016), which held that consecutive mandatory minimum terms under the 10-20-Life statute are permissible, but not mandatory, where, as here, the defendant shot at multiple victims. In all other respects, we affirm.
AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED and REMANDED in part.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.