Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2017

Lopez v. State

Lopez v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided February 21, 2017 · Roberts, Thomas, Wolf
211 So. 3d 331; 2017 WL 672142; 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 2282 (Southern Reporter, Third Series)

Lopez v. State

Opinion of the Court

WOLF, J.

Appellant alleges his consecutive mandatory minimum sentences were improper because it was apparent from the face of *332the record that the offenses arose from the same criminal episode and involved only one victim, and appellant did not discharge the firearm. See Williams v. State, 186 So.3d 989 (Fla. 2016). We agree, vacate appellant’s judgment and sentence, and reverse and remand for the trial court to enter an amended order providing for concurrent mandatory minimum sentences.

REVERSED and REMANDED with instructions.

ROBERTS, C.J., and B.L. THOMAS, J., CONCUR.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑