Davis v. State
Davis v. State
211 So. 3d 354; 2017 WL 728065; 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 2524
(Southern Reporter, Third Series)
Davis v. State
Opinion of the Court
Based upon our independent review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), we affirm Davis’s judgment and sentence. We remand only for correction of a scrivener’s error in the judgment. See Taylor v. State, 120 So.3d 213 (Fla. 5th DCA 2013) (“Despite affirmance, we remand the judgment and sentence on Count 2 for correction of a scrivener’s error in the written sentencing documents.” (citation omitted)). On re
AFFIRMED; REMANDED FOR CORRECTION OF A SCRIVENER’S ERROR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.