Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2017

Castillo v. State

Castillo v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided March 15, 2017 · Gross, Klingensmith
212 So. 3d 404; 2017 WL 1013184; 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 3447 (Southern Reporter, Third Series)

Castillo v. State

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Appellant challenges the denial of his post-conviction relief motion brought pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.801. The trial court denied the motion as untimely. Appellant filed the motion within one year of the appellate mandate. Rule 3.801(b) provides that no motion “shall be filed or considered pursuant to this rule if filed more than 1 year after the sentence becomes final.” A sentence becomes final when the appellate mandate issues. See generally Ghent v. State, 27 So.3d 121, 123 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010). Consequently, we accept the State’s concession and remand the case to the trial court for further review of the motion.

Reversed and Remanded.

Gross, May and Klingensmith, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.