Simpson v. State
Simpson v. State
217 So. 3d 229; 2017 WL 1492945; 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 5765
(Southern Reporter, Third Series)
Simpson v. State
Opinion of the Court
Mitchell Simpson (“the defendant”) appeals the trial court’s order denying his motion for postconviction relief, in which he alleged four grounds that cumulatively support his claim for ineffective assistance of trial counsel, requiring a new trial. As we conclude that the defendant’s arguments are without merit and/or refuted by the record, and the defendant has failed to meet his burden under Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984), we affirm.
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.