Santangelo v. State
Santangelo v. State
219 So. 3d 1000; 2017 WL 2438338; 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 8151
(Southern Reporter, Third Series)
Santangelo v. State
Opinion of the Court
Appellant’s judgment and sentence are affirmed. However, we remand for correction of the scrivener’s error contained in the probation ■ revocation order, which states that the appellant violated “Condition [] 2” of her probation rather than “Modification of Probation Condition (2).” See Nickolas v. State, 66 So.3d 1077 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011).
AFFIRMED; REMANDED for correction of scrivener’s error in probation revocation order.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.