Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2017

Jeudy v. State

Jeudy v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided May 10, 2017 · Conner, Gerber, Warner
219 So. 3d 843; 2017 WL 1929692; 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 6558 (Southern Reporter, Third Series)

Jeudy v. State

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Junior Jeudy appeals the trial court’s denial of his rule 3.850 motion. We accept the State’s concession on appellant’s first claim, and we remand for the trial court to correct appellant’s judgment to conform to the jury’s verdict that he was guilty of attempted carjacking and false imprisonment. The appellant need not be present for the correction. See Wiggins v. State, 992 So.2d 363, 364 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008).

We affirm the summary denial of claim two on the ground that appellant failed to demonstrate prejudice under Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 694, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). There was no defect in the information, no dispute as to the identity of the false imprisonment victim, and the evidence at trial established appellant’s guilt as alleged in the information.

Affirmed; remanded for entry of a corrected judgment.

Warner, Gerber and Conner, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.