Lacey v. State
Lacey v. State
221 So. 3d 689; 2017 WL 2858891; 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 9649
(Southern Reporter, Third Series)
Lacey v. State
Opinion of the Court
Appellant Randall Lacey appeals the summary denial of his rule 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief. The State concedes that the trial court erred in failing to allow Lacey an opportunity to amend the motion. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850(f)(2); Spera v. State, 971 So.2d 754 (Fla. 2007). We therefore reverse and remand for the trial court to afford Lacey an opportunity to file a facially sufficient motion.
Reversed and remanded.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.