Pestana v. Palm Springs General Hospital, Inc.
Pestana v. Palm Springs General Hospital, Inc.
221 So. 3d 764; 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 8947; 2017 WL 2664681
(Southern Reporter, Third Series)
Pestana v. Palm Springs General Hospital, Inc.
Opinion of the Court
The appellant seeks review of the trial court’s order granting final summary judgment in favor of the appellee. “[Sjummary judgment is appropriate where, as a matter of law, it is apparent from the pleadings, depositions, affidavits, or other evidence that there is no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to relief as a matter of law.” Fla. Bar v. Greene, 926 So.2d 1195, 1200 (Fla. 2006). Given the record before us, there was no genuine issue of material fact and the ap-pellee was entitled to relief as a matter of law. Id.; See Sokoloff v. Oceania I Condo. Ass’n, Inc., 201 So.3d 664, 664-65 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016).
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.