Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2017

Williams v. State

Williams v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided August 2, 2017 · Fernandez, Lagoa, Suarez
224 So. 3d 304; 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 11066; 2017 WL 3271632 (Southern Reporter, Third Series)

Williams v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Ortiz v. State, 9 So.3d 774, 775 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009) (“[f]ailure to obtain an on-the-record personal waiver of the right to a PSI is not required under current supreme court precedent, and it does not constitute fundamental error.”); Barton v. State, 706 So.2d 399, 400 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998) (“Because the appellant bargained for a habitual offender sentence and signed the plea form which clearly contemplated a habitualized sentence, one which he does not contest he qualifies for, he effectively waived the requirement of the presentence investigation report.”); Likely v. State, 583 So.2d 414, 414-15 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991) (“A defendant’s knowing waiver of the procedural rights accorded by § 775.084, the habitual offender statute, precludes any *305relief from the trial court’s failure to strictly follow the statute.”).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.