Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2017

Ring Power Corp. v. Condado-Perez

Ring Power Corp. v. Condado-Perez
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided August 18, 2017 · Badalamenti, Khouzam, Salario
224 So. 3d 885; 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 11835; 2017 WL 3560572 (Southern Reporter, Third Series)

Ring Power Corp. v. Condado-Perez

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

In light of the reversal of the underlying judgment on which the attorney’s fee order in this appeal is based, Ring Power Corp. v. Condado-Perez, 219 So.3d 1028, 1030 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017), we reverse the order on attorney’s fees. See ARC Foods, Inc. v. MGI Props., 746 So.2d 514, 514 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999); Siegel v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, 100 So.3d 783, 784 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012); S & I Invs. v. Payless Flea Mkt., Inc., 40 So.3d 48, 49 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010).

Reversed.

KHOUZAM, SALARIO, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.