Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2017

Madera v. State

Madera v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided September 22, 2017 · Cohen, Edwards, Lambert
226 So. 3d 385; 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 13393; 2017 WL 4182947 (Southern Reporter, Third Series)

Madera v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We affirm Appellant’s convictions and sentences but do so without prejudice to Appellant filing a motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) or 3.850 on his claim that the imposition of drug offender probation in this case is illegal. Appellant failed to preserve this claim for review on direct appeal by either contemporaneously objecting to the alleged sentencing error or by filing a motion pursuant to rule 3.800(b)(2). See Jackson v. State, 983 So.2d 562, 569 (Fla. 2008).

AFFIRMED.

COHEN, C.J., LAMBERT and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.